Legal Opinion
State v. Paulino
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 12, 1992No. 14449PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
The defendant, Jose Daniel Paulino, was convicted of the crime of possession of cocaine with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b).1 He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of twenty years. Thereafter, he appealed to the Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court. State v. Paulino, 26 Conn. App. 86, 598 A.2d 666 (1991). We granted the defendant certification to appeal to this court. We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court.
*463The Appellate Court accurately concluded that the jury could reasonably have found the following facts. “On May 3,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. WhipperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.