Legal Opinion
State v. Lo Sacco
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 28, 1992No. 9725PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
After a trial by jury, the defendant was convicted of assault in the third degree in violation of Gen*440eral Statutes § 53a-61. The defendant appeals his conviction, claiming that the trial court (1) improperly-allowed into evidence the fact that a jury had previously acquitted the victim of stabbing the defendant during the incident in question, (2) restricted the defendant’s cross-examination of a state’s witness in violation of his sixth amendment right of confrontation, (3) improperly restricted the defendant’s cross-examination of a state’s witness as to criminal charges pending against the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. SierraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. BelleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LoSacco v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
- Gundersen v. Manion, No. 31 13 86 (Jul. 23, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996