Carlos Antonio Estrada v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Carlos Antonio Estrada petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his requests for political asylum and withholding of deportation. We find that Estrada has not established either a clear probability of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution. We therefore hold that the decision of the BIA is supported by substantial evidence, and deny the petition for review.
I
Background
Estrada is a native and citizen of Guatemala. His wife and two children reside with him in this country. Estrada entered the United States in September…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Espectacion Bolanos-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Luz Marina Cardoza-Fonseca v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Francisca Rosa Arguello-Salguera v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Santos-Lemus v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Kirupanathan Perinpanathan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Vivian C. ARUTA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Young Sun Shin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Manuel Diaz Arteaga v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.