Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Dist. of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 28, 2018No. Case No. 14-cv-00886 (APM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Judie McNeil and her son, J.M., now an adult and co-plaintiff, seek to collect $198,653.43 in attorneys' fees and other costs associated with a successful action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. , against Defendant District of Columbia.1 Defendant does not contest Plaintiffs' status as a prevailing party under the IDEA, but does assert that the proposed hourly rates for Plaintiffs' counsel are not supported by adequate evidence and therefore are unreasonable. Moreover,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Covington v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  3. Eley v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  4. Rooths v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Alegria v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steckelberg v. Chamberlain School DistrictDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024
  2. White v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API