Legal Opinion

Steckelberg v. Chamberlain School District

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 18, 2024No. 4:21-cv-04147Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION JUDITH STECKELBERG and 4:21-CV-4147-LLP MICHAEL STECKELBERG, Parents on behalf of their minor child, AMS, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Petitioners/Appellees, ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES vs. CHAMBERLAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent/A ppellant. Petitioners/Appellees (“Steckelbergs”), parents of AMS, filed a motion for attorney fees under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)3)(B), a provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). (Doc. 68.) Steckelbergs seek at least $173,429.37 in attorney fees for work done on AMS’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API