Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA or Act) provides that a court “may award reasonable attorneys’ fees as part of the costs” to parents who prevail in an action brought under the Act. Ill Stat. 92, 20 U. S. C. § 1415(i)(3)(B). We granted certiorari to decide whether this fee-shifting provision authorizes prevailing parents to *294recover fees for services rendered by experts in IDEA actions. We hold that it does not.
I
Respondents Pearl and Theodore Murphy filed an action under the IDEA on behalf of their son, Joseph Murphy, seeking to require petitioner Arlington Central School…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by528 opinions
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Winkelman Ex Rel. Winkelman v. Parma City School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Katz v. Cellco PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
523 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.