Legal Opinion

Mellor v. Ten Sleep Cattle Company

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1976No. 4557PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

This is a negligence case and the only two issues, as stated in appellant’s brief, are as follows:

“I. The trial court’s holding that defendant Ten Sleep Cattle Company was not negligent is not supported by the evidence.”
“II. The trial court’s holding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent and/or assumed the risk is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to law.” 1

FACTS

The plaintiff, Leland N. Mellor, was a ranch workman employed by the defendant Cattle Company on the day he was injured. Mr. Mark Carter, the president and general manager of the Company, asked the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Maxted v. Pacific Car & Foundry CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Younglove v. Graham & HillWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Oedekoven v. OedekovenWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hughes v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. DS v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. TR v. Washakie County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Case v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API