Legal Opinion
Mellor v. Ten Sleep Cattle Company
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1976No. 4557PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
This is a negligence case and the only two issues, as stated in appellant’s brief, are as follows:
“I. The trial court’s holding that defendant Ten Sleep Cattle Company was not negligent is not supported by the evidence.”
“II. The trial court’s holding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent and/or assumed the risk is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to law.” 1
FACTS
The plaintiff, Leland N. Mellor, was a ranch workman employed by the defendant Cattle Company on the day he was injured. Mr. Mark Carter, the president and general manager of the Company, asked the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Maxted v. Pacific Car & Foundry CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Younglove v. Graham & HillWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Oedekoven v. OedekovenWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Hughes v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- DS v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- TR v. Washakie County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Case v. GossWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.