Legal Opinion

Crozier-Straub, Inc. v. Graham

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 26, 1928No. 3776-3778PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

These three patent suits were tried together but were decided by separate decrees dismissing the bill in each case. The plaintiffs, the same in each case, appealed. The appeals were heard together, will be considered together on the issue of validity, common to all, and considered separately on the issues of infringement, different in each.

These appeals bring here again Letters Patent No. 1,212,840 issued on January 16, 1917, to Francis J. Straub for a building block and method of making the same, known in the building trade as the “cinder block” and “Straub’s cinder…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Straub v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Devex Corporation, in No. 71-1344 v. General Motors Corporation, in No. 71-1345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Vortex Mfg. Co. v. Ply-Rite Contracting Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1929
  3. Girdler Corp. v. Abbotts Dairies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Crozier-Straub, Inc. v. ReiterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. GAF Corp. v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API