Legal Opinion
Devex Corporation, in No. 71-1344 v. General Motors Corporation, in No. 71-1345
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 26, 1972No. 71-1344, 71-1345PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
In the decision, 316 F.Supp. 1376, from which this appeal has been taken the District Court for the District of Delaware held, after full hearing on the merits, that a lubricating process used by General Motors Corporation, hereinafter “GM,” to facilitate the fashioning of metal into automobile bumpers and other manufactures did not infringe claim 4 of Reissue Patent No. 24,017, owned by Devex Corporation and hereinafter designed as the Henrieks patent. 1
Cold forming operations, with which this patent is concerned, involve pressing a workpiece, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Devex Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Devex Corporation v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Devex Corporation v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Eutectic Corporation, New Metals Corporation and Metallizing Company of America, Inc., and Cross-Appellants v. Metco, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.