In re Sarlo
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court. Edward W. WinRiejrd, Judge. The condition contained in the grant of license was not authorized by law. 43 Ark. 42; Kirby’s Dig. § § 5119, SI2°- The right to regulate the liquor traffic is vested in the Legislature. 43 Ark. 364; 45 Ark. 356; 34 Ark. 397. The county court merely has the power to license. 41 Ark. 485; 31 Ark. 462; 46 Ark. 358. And does not include the power to revoke the license granted. 17 Col. 302; 6 Rich. 404; 43 la. 514;…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court. Edward W. WinRiejrd, Judge. The condition contained in the grant of license was not authorized by law. 43 Ark. 42; Kirby’s Dig. § § 5119, SI2°- The right to regulate the liquor traffic is vested in the Legislature. 43 Ark. 364; 45 Ark. 356; 34 Ark. 397. The county court merely has the power to license. 41 Ark. 485; 31 Ark. 462; 46 Ark. 358. And does not include the power to revoke the license granted. 17 Col. 302; 6 Rich. 404; 43 la. 514; 52 la. 515; 150 Mass. 325; 163 Mass. 470; 21 Minn. 512; 46 N. J. b. 108; 5 Hun, 25; 95 N. Y. 223; 21 Or. 83; 29 Grat.…
1Opinion of the CourtHirr, C. J.
When the matter of granting liquor license in Pulaski County for the year 1905 came before the county court, the court decided to grant license in the county upon this condition or reservation, which was incorporated in the license issued to all applicants who were found qualified, towit: “Conditioned that this license is issued, by the consent and agreement of the licensee, upon the condition that if the licensee shall permit gambling upon the premises, or if gambling occurs upon the same through his connivance or agency, or if he is guilty of a breach of the Sunday law, or the law against…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Schwuchow v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Sprayberry v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Martin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robertson v. ScheinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Yarbrough v. Beardon and Phillips v. ForemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Blum v. Ford, Commissioner of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Cassidy v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Belt v. PaulSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905