Yarbrough v. Beardon and Phillips v. Foreman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.
These cases have been consolidated for trial in this court, since both present for decision the same principal questions, the constitutionality of Initiated Act No. 1, adopted, by the vote of the people at the general election held on November 3,1942, Acts 1943, p. 998.
The appeals in both cases involve county-wide local option elections in which the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors was voted out of the counties of Lawrence and Grant, on petitions therefor pursuant to tlie provisions of said Act No. 1, the sufficiency of which petitions is conceded in both cases.
It is earnestly…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Metropolitan Board of Excise v. . BarrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Schwuchow v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Board of Trustees v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Freeman v. LazarusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Our Community, Our Dollars v. BullockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Armstrong v. SturchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Lienhart v. BrutonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Tollett v. KnodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.