Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Danziger

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1916No. L. A. No. 3626. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County denying a motion to tax costs and to strike from the cost bill certain items for keeper’s fees. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.

Appeal from an order made after final judgment denying the appellants’ motion to have the costs taxed by the court, and to strike from the cost bill certain items relating to keepers’ fees.

The action in which this proceeding arose was commenced on December 18, 1911, to recover of the Lost Hills Syndicate, E. A. Wiltsee, J. M. Danziger, J. M. Kent and others, the sum of $1,170.42, for wages and for moneys advanced. Personal service was made on defendants Danziger and Kent. On December 20, 1911, a writ of attachment was issued and levied upon personalty and fixtures consisting principally of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nisbet v. Clio Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. FigelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Witherspoon v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. LermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Elsman v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Holm v. OverholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API