Legal Opinion

Holm v. Overholt

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent sheriff of Fresno County to retain certain personal property in his possession subject to the petitioner’s lien of attachment. As a return to the alternative writ, the respondent demurred generally to the petition.

The petition alleges that on or about the twentieth day of March, 1931, the petitioner commenced an action in the Superior Court of Fresno County against the Standard Planing Mill, a corporation, and others, to recover the sum of $24,256 alleged to be due on certain promissory notes, and for attorneys’ fees, etc.; that a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aigeltinger v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wood v. LowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Callahan v. DanzigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. LermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API