Witherspoon v. Cross
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
This action is upon an undertaking on attachment, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the assignor of plaintiff, by reason of the depreciation in the market value of certain personal property belonging to said assignor while said property was held under attachment. The appellants were the sureties upon said attachment bond.
The action in which said writ of attachment issued was. brought by A. P. Cross against George W. Laing and others, to recover the sum of $1,984.10, and under said writ personal property belonging to said Laing, of the value of two thousand.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Webster v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCarthy Co. v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Callahan v. DanzigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916