Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Figel
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County denying an application for the sale of personal property under attachment. John E. Richards, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The court below denied the motion of the plaintiff for an order directing the sale, by virtue of the provisions of section 547 of the Code of Civil Procedure, of certain personal property, which the sheriff had levied upon and seized under a writ of attachment issued in this action.
This appeal is from the order denying the application for the sale of the property.
The motion was made upon the 'affidavit by one of the attorneys for the plaintiff and upon the testimony of eleven witnesses taken and heard on behalf of the plaintiff. No part of the testimony so taken is presented in the record on…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Stockton v. RattnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Conservatorship of RichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Callahan v. DanzigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Huston v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Melick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.