Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Haynes v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1938No. 7,708PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion:

2Per curiam

This is an application by Blanche Haynes and another, voters and taxpayers, relatrices, for a writ of supervisory control directed to a judge of the district court of Lewis and Clark county.

The controversy involves House Bill No. 196, now Chapter 84 of the Laws of the Twenty-fifth Legislative Assembly, 1937. The Chapter carries the following title: “An Act to Regulate, License and Authorize the Sale of Liquor at Retail in the State of Montana; Authorizing, Empowering and Directing the Montana Liquor Control Board to Issue Retail Liquor Licenses to Persons Qualified Under This Act to…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Cunningham v. Northwestern Improvement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State Ex Rel. Toomey v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Slama v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Boards of County Road Commissioners v. Board of State CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Martin v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State ex rel. Graham v. Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Judge v. Legislative Finance CommitteeMontana Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API