Legal Opinion

Slama v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 17, 1981PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

George R. Slama and eleven other qualified voters (first signers) signed an initiative petition entitled “An Act providing for the participation of the municipalities in State taxes generated in those municipalities” (Initiative 11/81). Citing art. 48 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution, the Attorney General refused to certify Initiative 11/81, because it “makes a specific appropriation of money from the treasury.”

The first signers and the city of Boston sought an injunction from a single justice compelling the Attorney General to certify and prepare a fair and concise summary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Blixt v. BlixtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API