Legal Opinion

Krueger v. Crystal Lake Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1924No. 23681PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

A permanent injunction was granted by the district court restraining the defendants from diverting and conducting water from a natural watercourse through a conduit and' discharging it into Crystal lake, thereby overflowing certain lands of the plaintiff. Defendants and a large number of-intervening defendants have appealed.

• The’ facts are substantially as follows: Crystal lake, is a natural lake, about seven miles long, the bed of which was formerly the main.channel of the Missouri river. It is somewhat crescent shaped, and is of a character known in the Missouri valley as a “cut-off lake,”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCann v. . Chasm Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Brundage v. KnoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Spelman v. City of PortageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Murphy v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Conn v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lackaff v. BogueNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Clements v. Phœnix Utility Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Block v. FranzenNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API