Conn v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Willard E. Stewart, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.
The plaintiffs allege that the defendant “negligently and carelessly threw up and built an embankment across said lands in such a manner as to deprive all of said lands to the east of said embankment of drainage facilities for surface waters which had theretofore been afforded by *733the natural slope of said land southeast of the Nemaha river, apd plaintiffs allege that defendant has negligently and carelessly maintained said embankments * * * to this time.” No motion was filed to make the petition more definite and certain, and, under the general allegation of negligence, any evidence was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Morrissey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Jacobson v.Van BoeningNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Morse v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Lincoln & Black Hills Railroad v. SutherlandNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flesner v. SteinbruckNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Murphy v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Brown v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1912
- Krueger v. Crystal Lake Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
- Conn v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.