Legal Opinion

Pape v. Pape

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1918No. 9,471PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Allen Superior Court; Carl Tapie, Judge. Action by William Pape against tbe Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, in which the company filed an interpleader making parties all living-children of insured, and the several parties joined issues by way of cross-complaints and other pleadings. From the judgment rendered, Charles G. Pape and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

The questions presented in this appeal had their origin in a suit on an insurance policy. The undisputed facts developed at the trial in the court below, pertinent and necessary to an understanding of said questions are in substance as follows:

The life insured by the policy involved was that of Carl Pape, hereinafter referred to as “C.”- He was twice married, and had children by each wife. By his first wife, Wilhelmina, he had five children, whose names and the dates of whose births are respectively as follows: Elizabeth (Pape) Isreal, born in 1859; *156William Pape, born in 1862; Henry Pape,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. McAleer v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Indiana National Life Insurance v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Harley v. HeistIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Lafayette v. KeenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Continental Ins. Co. v. MadoniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. General Realty Co. v. SilcoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API