Harley v. Heist
Indiana Supreme Court
From the TCosciuskn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
The record in this case presents in different forms the following material facts:
On the 1st day of February, 1867, in consideration.of the payment of a premium of $70.20 by David Snyder, and the same amount thereafter to be paid annually, the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company executed and delivered to said David Snyder a policy of insurance upon his life, in which it agreed to pay $2,000 upon due proof of his death.
That portion of the policy which is material to the parties in this controversy is as follows: “And the said company do hereby promise and agree with the said assured, his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
- Bicker v. Charter Oak Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Chapin v. FellowesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
- Hutson v. MerrifieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Pence v. MakepeaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Holland v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Presbyterian Mutual Assurance Fund v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Griffith v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Millard v. BraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Kline v. National Benefit Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.