Massachusetts Highway Department v. Smith
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.
In conjunction with a taking by the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD) of property belonging to the *615defendant (trust) for the construction of the Central Artery/ Tunnel project in East Boston, the parties entered into an agreement containing an indemnification clause. Under the agreement, the trust3 was to indemnify MHD for all costs and liability “arising by reason of” the release of oil; the bringing of oil; or the use, generation, or disposal of oil on the property during the trust’s ownership of the property. When the trust refused to indemnify MHD for certain costs and liability…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Vaughan v. Eastern Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Reynolds Aluminum Building Products Co. v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rasheed v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- ANJ Corp. v. RossMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014
- Jackson v. ByrneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Morse v. SylvesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2015