Legal Opinion
Reynolds Aluminum Building Products Co. v. Leonard
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 25, 1985PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
In this contract action, we must determine the duties of the trial judge when he decides to ameliorate the effects of admissions that have become binding by the operation ofDist. Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P. 36 (1975). The plaintiff, Reynolds Aluminum Building Products Company (Reynolds), brought suit to recover for the sale and installation of a solar hot water heating system in the defendants’ house. The defendants, the Leonards, denied liability because the system allegedly did not function as advertised, and they asserted a counterclaim based on G. L. c. 93A for false advertising. During the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Asea, Inc. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, a Corporation, and Harbor Belt Line, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Brook Village North Associates v. General Electric Company, Re-Entry and Environmental Systems DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Green v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Town Planning & Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Amesbury Specialty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Ellis v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Yankee Microwave, Inc. v. Petricca Communications Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Merritt v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Campana v. Board of Directors of Massachusetts Housing Finance AgencyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.