Legal Opinion
Bliss v. Bliss
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 22, 1999No. 97-FM-701, 97-FM-1019PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge.
Daniel Bliss appeals from a judgment enforcing a Russian custody order, awarding sole custody of the parties’ son, Nikita, to the mother, Elena Bliss. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in its determination that he had been afforded procedural due process in the Russian court. In addition, appellant contests the trial court’s subsequent order awarding attorney’s fees to Ms. Bliss under D.C.Code § 16-4515(d) (1997), asserting that he could not have violated the Russian custody order until the trial court had determined that the Russian order was valid. We affirm.
I
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Vereen v. ClayborneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bazemore v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Robinson v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- George Washington University v. WaasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re ShearinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Pavlov v. Bank of New York Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Nigel L. Scott v. Janice BurginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- RICHARD Z. DUFFEE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In the Matter of Ismail Yaman and Linda YamanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.