Legal Opinion

Nigel L. Scott v. Janice Burgin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2014No. 12-CV-1474PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

Appellants Nigel L. Scott and the Yal-lery and Scott Law Firm (collectively, “Scott”) appeal from a jury malpractice award in favor of appellee Janice Burgin, who was not a client of the firm. We hold that, as a matter of law, appellants’ duty of care did not extend to Burgin and, accordingly, reverse the judgment.

I. Factual Background

Kenneth Woodruff (“Woodruff’ or the “decedent”) was married to, but separated from, Patricia Woodruff when he met Bur-gin in 1983. He proposed to her in that year and again in 1996. In 1986 Burgin moved in with Woodruff, and they carried…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. George C. Papageorge v. Jonathan Zucker & Patricia DausDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Jonathan Dawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. George C. Papageorge v. Jonathan Zucker & Patricia DausDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Jonathan Dawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Shawn Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API