Legal Opinion

Hpa v. Sca

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1985No. S-197, S-227Published

1Opinion of the Court

704 P.2d 205 (1985)

H.P.A., Appellant and Cross-Appellee,

v.

S.C.A., Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Nos. S-197, S-227.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

August 9, 1985.

Rehearing Denied September 16, 1985.

H. Clay Keene, Keene & Currall, Ketchikan, for appellant and cross-appellee.

A. Fred Miller, A. Fred Miller, a Professional Corporation, Ketchikan, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

H.P.A. (Husband) and S.C.A. (Wife) married in 1974. Two years later, Husband had a vasectomy. The parties…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. AndreasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Burrell v. BurrellAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Curley v. CurleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API