Legal Opinion
Rusnak v. Woodbridge Tp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 27, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 N.J. Super. 309 (1961)
174 A.2d 276
JOSEPH RUSNAK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 27, 1961.
Mr. Edward J. Dolan, attorney for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Platoff, Platoff & Heftler, attorneys for defendants S. Klein Department Stores, Inc., and Monroe Estates, Inc.
Mr. Stewart M. Huff, attorney for all other defendants.
THOMPSON, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is an action in lieu of prerogative writs brought by residents, officials and former officials of the Township of Woodbridge seeking to set aside the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Ward v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Morrill Realty Corp. v. Rayon Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- People ex rel. Decker v. WatersNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Crown Cotton Mills v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stamford Ridgeway Associates v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Johnson v. Township of MontvilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Kernick v. Penn Hills TownshipAllegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1964