People ex rel. Decker v. Waters
New York Supreme Court
Cebtiobabi to review action of a board of excise in refusing to relator a license. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtPabkeb, J.
The relator seeks by this proceeding to review the action of the respondents, who constitute the excise board of the town of Saugerties, in denying his application for a license.
*2Proceedings of this character appear to be authorized by chapter 481 of the Laws of 1893. The members of the board of excise by their return set forth the proceedings at their meeting in May, by which it appears that they granted thirteen hotel licenses for the village of Saugerties and considered relator’s application, and rejected it for reasons stated in a memorandum filed by said commissioners. The facts alleged…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
- Carden v. SpilmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
- People Ex Rel. Sims v. Board of Fire CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People ex rel. Bailey v. Supervisors of GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- People Ex Rel. Mott v. . Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by13 opinions
- Merchants Indem. Corp. v. EgglestonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- In re the Application of the Attorney-GeneralNew York Supreme Court · 1897
- TRUST CO. OF MORRIS CTY. v. NicholsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Rusnak v. Woodbridge Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- People ex rel. Davis v. TrumanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.