Legal Opinion
United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 30, 1997No. Civ-S-91-768 DFL JFMPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
The United States and the State of California (together “the Government”) are seeking to recover CERCLA response costs incurred in investigating and abating hazardous sub stance contamination at Iron Mountain Mine. See 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). One of the defendants against whom the Government is seeking to recover is Rhóne-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co., Inc. To prevail, the Government must establish that Rhóne-Poulenc is a responsible party as defined by CERCLA. 1 The Government and Rhóne-Poulenc now cross move for partial adjudication on the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wallis v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Atherton v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Vine Street, LLC v. Keeling Ex Rel. Estate of KeelingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. International Paper Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.