Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided February 17, 2005No. CIV.A. 203CV00157PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAMS, Senior District Judge.

The plaintiff, United States of America, (“Government”), has filed a complaint alleging that defendants Lorenzo Grode Martin, (“Martin”), and Reginald Anthony Falice, (“Falice”), intending to harm the creditworthiness and reputations of the named debtors, did knowingly file financing statements with the Virginia State Corporation Commission, (‘Virginia SCC”), in which Martin and Falice falsely identified themselves as secured parties. (Docket Item No. 1.) This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion For Summary Judgment, (Docket Item…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Monroe v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Jones v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Bundy v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Jones v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Monroe v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API