Legal Opinion
Bundy v. Beard
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.
Presently before this Court are the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by Respondent Jeffrey Beard, in his capacity as Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC), in response to a pro se petition for review 1 filed by Antonio Bundy (Petitioner) in this Court’s original jurisdiction. Petitioner is seeking declaratory relief. We now sustain DOC’s preliminary objections and dismiss Petitioner’s petition for review.
Petitioner is an inmate committed to the custody of DOC, and he is currently incarcerated at the State…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ex Parte HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Small v. HornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Banks v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Humphrey v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth, Office of Attorney General v. East Brunswick TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- A. Brown v. J. WetzelCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- D. Martin v. Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent James A. EckardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.