Legal Opinion

Layson v. Grange

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. The opinion herein, filed April 9, 1892, contains a sufficient statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C.:

The question presented by the record in this case is one of homestead exemption. Thomas A. Grange owned three lots adjoining each other on Lime street, in the city of Topeka. The tract contained less than one' acre. He resided on these lots with his family, in a house located upon the north subdivision. Across the rear end of the three lots he had a corral fenced off for his cow and horse. His well, cistern, coal-house and other out-buildings were all located upon the same number as his house. Upon the south lot the defendant in error had a building which he had used for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashton v. IngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Bebb v. CroweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Stevens v. HollingsworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hoffman v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Deford v. Painter, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. In Re HallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  5. Iola Wholesale Grocery Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API