Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Hill

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Russell District Court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

*612The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The only question involved in this case is, whether lot number 5, in block number 16, in the city of Bunker Hill, in Russell county, was and is exempt as a homestead from a certain attachment and judgment and order of sale. The attachment was levied upon the property on June 30, 1888. The judgment was rendered on October 8, 1888, and the property was sold on an order of sale issued on such judgment on January 26, 1889; and on March 2,1889, Andrew Hill, who was the defendant below and the judgment debtor, and who is now the defendant in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  2. Hogan v. MannersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ShannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Deford v. Painter, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  3. Layson v. GrangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  4. In Re HallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  5. Linn v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API