Legal Opinion

Ex parte Northrup

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1902PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Multnomah: John B. Cleland, Melvin C. George, and Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judges, in joint session. Petition for release from custody by W. N. Northrup. From an order denying the writ, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The legislature, at its last biennial session, enacted a statute making it “a misdemeanor for any person or persons to carry on the business of barbering on Sunday in Oregon”: Laws, 1901, p. 17. The petitioner is charged with its violation, and, being in the custody of an officer, instituted a proceeding in the circuit court by habeas corpus, to secure his release, and, being unsuccessful, prosecutes an appeal to this court. The statute is challenged as in derogation to the fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution, and to Const. Or. Art. I, § 1, and Art. IV, § 23.

1. The first position…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Petit v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ladd v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Eden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Warren v. MARION COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. General Electric Co. v. WattleOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. City of St. Louis v. DeLassusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. CHRISTIAN v. La ForgeOregon Supreme Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API