Smith v. Frandsen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Appellants, Steve and Catherine Smith (the Smiths), filed suit against appellee, Mel Frandsen dba Mary Mel Construction Company (Mary Mel), seeking compensatory and punitive damages for negligent misrepresentation, negligence, and fraudulent concealment after the footings, foundation, and structure of their home settled, allegedly due to improper soil compaction and a general lack of lateral support.
¶ 2 The trial court granted Mary Mel’s motion for summary judgment, and the Smiths filed a timely notice of appeal. We affirm.
FACTS
¶ 3 In the early 1990s,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Coburn v. Lenox Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Ferree v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- B.R. v. WestUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Yazd v. Woodside Homes Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
- Moore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Dillon v. Southern Management Corp. Retirement TrustUtah Supreme Court · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.