Legal Opinion

Middlesex Construction Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Art Museum Building Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 8, 1983No. 575PA82PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

At issue is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motions to dismiss. The resolution of this issue involves the interpretation of and the interaction between a statutory provision, G.S. § 143-135.3, and the judicial prescript enunciated in Smith v. State, 289 N.C. 303, 222 S.E. 2d 412.

In Smith, this Court wrote:

We hold, therefore, that whenever the State of North Carolina, through its authorized officers and agencies, enters into a valid contract, the State implicitly consents to be sued for damages on the contract in the event it breaches the contract.

Id. at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Great American Insurance Company v. GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Stahl-Rider, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sanders v. State Personnel CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. RPR & ASSOCIATES v. O'Brien/Atkins AssociatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995
  3. Huyck Corp. v. C. C. Mangum, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of AdministrationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Nello L. Teer Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API