Stahl-Rider, Inc. v. State
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
The sole exception preserved by defendants and presented in this appeal concerns whether the trial judge erred in denying their motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and the person.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court’s order denying defendants’ motions to dismiss is interlocutory and therefore not appealable. The question of appealability of trial court orders and judgments has been the subject of a number of decisions of this Court and of our Supreme Court. In these decisions, we find a consistent thread of jurisprudential philosophy in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Green Ex Rel. Crudup v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Locus v. Fayetteville State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Zimmer v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Can Am South, LLC v. State, North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.