United States v. Jorge Alberto Navarro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA., Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we examine the scope of the United States Sentencing Commission’s (the “Commission”) authority to limit the retroactive effect of its amendments to its Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that a district court cannot apply a retroactive amendment to reduce an already imposed sentence prior to that amendment’s effective date. We also hold that the Commission’s determination of the appropriate effective date for a retroactive amendment is not invalid simply because the Commission made reference to prisoners’ rehabilitative needs. We therefore affirm.
I
A
In…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Darren Bottinelli v. Josias SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ernest Franceschi, Jr. v. John ChiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Raul Mercado-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. D.M.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Padilla-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.