Legal Opinion

United States v. Jorge Alberto Navarro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2015No. 15-10245PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TASHIMA., Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we examine the scope of the United States Sentencing Commission’s (the “Commission”) authority to limit the retroactive effect of its amendments to its Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that a district court cannot apply a retroactive amendment to reduce an already imposed sentence prior to that amendment’s effective date. We also hold that the Commission’s determination of the appropriate effective date for a retroactive amendment is not invalid simply because the Commission made reference to prisoners’ rehabilitative needs. We therefore affirm.

I

A

In…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Darren Bottinelli v. Josias SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Ernest Franceschi, Jr. v. John ChiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Raul Mercado-MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. D.M.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Padilla-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API