State v. Lemmond
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
We hold that the court did not err in overruling defendant’s motion for nonsuit.
Where time is not of the essence of the offense and the statute of limitations is not involved, a discrepancy between the date alleged in the indictment and the date shown by the State’s evidence is ordinarily not fatal. G.S. 15-155; State v. Wilson, 264 N.C. 373, 141 S.E. 2d 801; State v. Williams, 261 N.C. 172, 134 S.E. 2d 163; State v. Baxley, 223 N.C. 210, 25 S.E. 2d 621; State v. Gore, 207 N.C. 618, 178 S.E. 209; State v. Overcash, 182 N.C. 889, 109 S.E. 626; State v. Lilly, 3 N.C. App. 276, 164…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Galloway Ex Rel. Parks v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. HeiserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Dean v. NashCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.