State v. Hughes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant first assigns as error the State’s failure to grant him a speedy trial. We begin by noting that North Carolina’s Speedy Trial Act does not apply since the offense occurred before the statute’s effective date. G.S. 15A-701 to -704. Defendant’s claim, therefore, rests on his right to a speedy trial, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 87 S.Ct. 988, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1 (1967). The right to a speedy trial is more vague than other procedural rights because “speedy” is not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.