Legal Opinion

State v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 8121SC314PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the State’s failure to grant him a speedy trial. We begin by noting that North Carolina’s Speedy Trial Act does not apply since the offense occurred before the statute’s effective date. G.S. 15A-701 to -704. Defendant’s claim, therefore, rests on his right to a speedy trial, guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213, 87 S.Ct. 988, 18 L.Ed. 2d 1 (1967). The right to a speedy trial is more vague than other procedural rights because “speedy” is not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API