Small v. Oneita Industries
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Waller, Justice:
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion reported at 314 S.C. 198,442 S.E. (2d) 213 (Ct. App. 1994). We affirm.
FACTS
Small filled out an employment application for Respondent, Oneita Industries, in which he denied ever having any back problems. In fact, Small had a twenty-five percent disability rating due to back injuries suffered in prior employment. Unaware of his back problems, Oneita hired Small as a materials handler. Small injured his back in March 1991 while pushing a 200-pound box full of cloth. He did not return to work but was not officially…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Givens v. Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Vines v. Champion Building ProductsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Carroll v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brayboy v. WorkforceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Fotia v. Palmetto Behavioral HealthDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
- O'Hara v. A.D. Jacobson Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Isaac D. Brailey v. Michelin North America, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
- Isaac D. Brailey v. Michelin North America, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2024