Brayboy v. Workforce
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge
In this workers’ compensation case, claimant Lawrence Brayboy made material misrepresentations on his employment application. Subsequently, Brayboy claimed workers’ compensation benefits, which the Workers’ Compensation Commission awarded. The circuit court upheld the award on the basis of the substantial evidence standard of review. Because the issue of Brayboy’s employment status is jurisdictional, the Court makes findings based on its view of the preponderance of the evidence. We find the employer, WorkForce, established the three-factor test in Cooper v. McDevitt & St. Co., 260 S.C. 463,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Chavis v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Alewine v. Tobin Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Givens v. Steel Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fredrick v. WELLMAN, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Shuler v. Tri-County Electric Co-Op, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Shatto v. McLEOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Rabon v. Arrow Exterminating, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cromer Food Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.