Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Jackson National Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 28, 1991No. 1665PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Mary Louise Carroll (Carroll) brought this action to recover on two $50,000 life insurance policies. The court granted her summary judgment motion because Jackson National Life Insurance Company (the Insurance Company), admitted it could not prove a causal connection between the insured’s misrepresentation of his health history and the cause of death. We affirm.

ISSUE

The sole issue is whether a life insurer must prove a causal connection between a misrepresentation pertaining to health history and death before coverage can be voided under a life insurance policy.

FACTS

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. South State InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Atlantic Life Insurance v. BeckhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Berry v. Virginia State InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Small v. Coastal States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. FurmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Small v. Oneita IndustriesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Carroll v. Jackson National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Carroll v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Van Horn v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API