Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Rideout
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 2003No. 72366-4PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[As amended by order of the Supreme Court October 27, 2003.]
Alexander, C.J.
Christopher Rideout initiated a contempt proceeding in superior court against his former wife, Sara Rideout. In it he alleged that Sara demonstrated a pattern of interference with residential time with their children to which Christopher was entitled pursuant to a court-approved parenting plan and a subsequent court order establishing a summer residential schedule. After a hearing, the superior court held Sara in contempt for what it concluded was her “bad faith” failure to comply with the terms of the court order…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Truck Ins. Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Jannot v. JannotWashington Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Gourley v. GourleyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.