Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Roorda

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 14, 1980No. 7618-3-IPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

This action presents for our consideration the showing that must be made by the petitioner, Meindert Roorda, to meet the requirements of "adequate cause" under RCW 26.09.270:

A party seeking a temporary custody order or modification of a custody decree shall submit together with his motion, an affidavit setting forth facts supporting the requested order or modification and shall give notice, together with a copy of his affidavit, to other parties to the proceedings, who may file opposing affidavits. The court shall deny the motion unless it finds that adequate cause for hearing the motion is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. McDonald v. Whatcom County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Schuster v. SchusterWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jannot v. JannotWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Parentage of JannotWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jannot v. JannotCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. In re the Marriage of LemkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Pridgeon v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API