Legal Opinion

Lovell v. Potts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1924PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Section 45 — 1, Or. L., provides:

“No judge of a circuit court of the State of Oregon shall sit to hear or try any suit, action or proceeding when it shall be established, as hereinafter provided, that such judge is prejudiced against any party or attorney, or the interest of any party or attorney appearing in such cause. In such case, the presiding judge shall forthwith transfer the suit or action to another department of the same court, or call in a judge from some other court, or apply to the chief justice of the supreme court to send a judge to try the case * *

*541From the foregoing provision…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. v. HenseySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. BelliwithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. Kearney v. SnodgrassOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Sweeney v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. West v. PraterIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Halvorson v. Blue Mountain Prune Growers CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. GambleOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. KerronOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Fish v. BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API