Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action, in the district court for Ramsey county. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Dickson, J., who granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. From the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant ithe value of her statutory marital interest in certain lands in Traverse county of which she claims she was deprived by the wrongful ¡acts of the defendant and her deceased husband. The court directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals from the order «denying her motion for a new trial.
1. In 1895 Cyrus Wellington, the husband of the plaintiff, entered into two contracts, with the defendant, each for the purchase of a half section of land in Traverse county. A small portion of the purchase price was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Niggeler v. MaurinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Randall v. ConstansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Wilder v. HaugheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Abbott v. MoldestadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Stannard v. MarboeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Veranth v. MoravitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Schultz v. Consolidated School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.