Schultz v. Consolidated School District No. 1
Supreme Court of Minnesota
.From an order of tlie superintendent of schools of Blue Earth county consolidating school districts Nos. 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 90 and 106 in that county, William Schultz and others appealed to the district court for that county, where the matter was heard before Comstock, J., who made findings and annulled the action of the county superintendent. All parties moved to amend the findings and conclusions and the Consolidated School District moved for a new trial.
Read the full summary
.From an order of tlie superintendent of schools of Blue Earth county consolidating school districts Nos. 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 90 and 106 in that county, William Schultz and others appealed to the district court for that county, where the matter was heard before Comstock, J., who made findings and annulled the action of the county superintendent. All parties moved to amend the findings and conclusions and the Consolidated School District moved for a new trial. From the orders denying these motions, all parties appealed. It was stipulated a suit for an injunction should abide -the decision of…
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
September 20, 1915, certain freeholders in the school districts Nos. 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 90 and 106 of Blue Earth county filed a petition for the consolidation of those districts. Thereupon the county superintendent called a meeting of the electors of these school districts for the purpose of voting on the question of consolidation. The meeting was held, consolidation carried and the county superintendent made an order of consolidation. Thereupon certain electors appealed to the district court and certain electors also commenced an action to restrain further proceedings under the petition.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schweigert v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Abbott v. MoldestadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Hook v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mark v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- School District No. 135 v. McConnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- School District 56 Consolidated v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. City of FraserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934