Legal Opinion

Hill v. Favour

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1938No. Civil No. 3993PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

On or about November 28, 1930, Thomas R. Short and Catharina Short, his wife, gave their promissory note for $5,163, secured by mortgage on real estate situate in Prescott, Yavapai county, Arizona, to the Intermountain Building & Loan Association, a Utah corporation, and hereafter referred to as the Association.

On June 2, 1936, the Shorts filed their complaint in interpleader in the superior court of said Yavapai county naming R. O. Barrett, A. H. Favour, A. Gh Baker, and H. S. McCluskey, the Receiver of the Association, and the Association, as conflicting claimants of the note and mortgage…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cornish v. WoolvertonMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Brecht v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McBride v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Hatoff v. Lemons & Associates, Inc. (In Re Lemons & Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1986
  3. Best Fertilizers of Arizona, Inc. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Cagle v. ButcherArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Silving v. Wells Fargo Bank, NaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API