Legal Opinion

Nat. Bank of N.J. v. Lefkowits

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 26, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainants' bill is by the holder of a bond and mortgage, against subsequent grantees of the mortgaged premises, on the covenant in their deed whereby they assumed the payment of the mortgage debt, for the recovery of a deficiency remaining after foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged premises.

Defendants' motion is to strike out the bill on the ground that complainant failed to file with the common pleas clerk in Middlesex county (where the mortgaged premises are situate), a notice of his proposed action, as required by P.L. 1907 ch. 231 § 1, prior to the commencement of this suit.

Assuming…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. RosenthalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. Zanzonico v. ZanzonicoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Alexander v. ManzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  4. Black Diamond, C., Newark v. RedlinghouseNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  5. Fid. Union Trust v. Prudent Invest.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API